Header graphic for print
The BD/IA Regulator Providing securities regulatory, enforcement and litigation trends for broker-dealers, investment advisers and investment funds

Second Circuit Maintains Expansive View of Civil Liability for Insider Trading

Posted in Enforcement, Insider Trading, SEC Enforcement

On February 18, 2014, in SEC v. Contorinis,[1] the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed an order requiring Joseph Contorinis to personally disgorge more than $7 million in insider trading profits realized by a fund he co-managed, even though he did not personally receive those profits. In doing so, the court continued its expansive reading of civil liability for insider trading.

The Second Circuit’s broad view of civil disgorgement follows an earlier opinion in which the court adopted a similarly expansive view of what is required to establish civil liability for insider trading. In 2012, in SEC v. Obus,[2] the Second Circuit held that actual knowledge of a breach of a duty was not required to establish civil liability for either a tipper or a tippee. Rather, a tipper’s liability could flow from recklessly disregarding the nature of the confidential or nonpublic information, and a tippee’s liability could arise if he had “reason to know”[3] that the information may have been disclosed in violation of a duty of confidentiality.

Contorinis will facilitate the SEC’s pursuit of large civil recoveries beyond the tippee’s personal benefit from any insider trading.

To learn more, read our full client alert.


[1] Slip Op., No. 12-1723-cv (Feb. 18, 2014).

[2] 693 F.3d 276 (2d Cir. 2012). In Obus, the SEC alleged that a tipper revealed information to his friend who worked for a hedge fund, who in turn relayed that information to his boss, who traded based on the information.

[3] Obus, 693 F.3d at 289.